Facebook has become one of the most powerful marketing platforms on the planet. It’s the third most visited website globally. The average Facebook user clicks on 11 adverts per month. There has never been a better time to place adverts in front of your target audiences. Nick shares his knowledge on how to create ads and funnels that will grow your business and share the marketing tactics he still uses to grow all of their clients accounts.
Ready to explode your ad campaign results but don't know how? Whether you are running ads for your own business, or for your clients' we can help! Visit - https://theadsclinic.com/
And then join our Free Ads Clinic Skool. Click here: https://www.skool.com/theadsclinic
In this episode, Nick shares a new approach he has been testing in his Facebook ad campaigns over the past two months. He breaks down how he is combining different creative concepts with multiple variations to give Meta more creative diversity to work with. Using real campaign results, Nick explains why not every individual ad needs to be a winner, how different creatives can play different roles throughout the customer journey and why advertisers should focus on the overall performance of the campaign rather than judging every ad in isolation. If you’re looking to improve your Meta ads without constantly reinventing your entire creative strategy, this episode offers a practical way to think about creative testing and scaling.
BUT THERE'S MORE...
Follow me on Instagram to keep up to date with all the latest hacks: @nickboddington
Welcome to Let's run Facebook ads with me, Nick Boddington. This podcast is your go to for mastering Facebook ads. But as you know, success doesn't stop at the ad itself. We'll dive into everything from funnels and e-commerce to email marketing, lead generation and more. If you're ready to take your skills to the next level, check out my new school platform@school.com. The Ads clinic. Inside you'll find how to videos and live dropping clinicals where you can ask your Facebook questions and get the answers you need to grow your business. And lastly, if you enjoy the podcast, it would mean the world to me if you would subscribe to the channel. It's the best way to help the podcast grow and keep bringing you valuable content every week. Let's get on with the podcast. been testing a slightly different way of running my Facebook ads for the last two months. Instead of constantly creating completely new ads. I'm running seven different creative concepts, but inside each one I'm giving meta three, four, sometimes five different iterations of the same creative, using flexible, creative. so far across these ads, I've spent around 700 pounds and average cost per result of 6.40 pounds. Which is exactly where I need it to be. But what's interesting isn't just the 6.40 pounds. It's what's happening inside the campaign. Some ads are considerably cheaper, some are more expensive, some iterations barely get touched. But when you look at the campaign as a whole. I think this gives us a really good example of what meta actually means when it keeps telling advertisers it wants creative diversity. So this video, I'm going to take you directly into my ads manager and show you exactly how I've structured this. Break down the different creatives and show you the results after around two months of testing it. If you're new to this channel, I've been running meta ads for over ten years, and on this channel, I tried to cut through a lot of the theory and show you what's actually happening inside real ad accounts, and this particular test has become one of my favorite ways of running ads at the moment, because one of the biggest conversations around meta right now is creative diversity. Meta doesn't just want us to give it ten versions of essentially the same advert. It wants different concepts, different formats, different messages, different reasons for someone to stop scrolling. there's another layer to this, which I think a lot of advertisers are missing. once I have those different concepts, I can then give meta multiple iterations within each content. rather than seven ads, meaning seven pieces of creative, my seven ads could actually give meta 25 or 30 different creative variations to work with. that's what I want to show you. So let me take you into the ad account show exactly what I Hey, while I've got you, I just wanted to ask. Would you like me to go into your ads manager and actually see what's working? Because I bet your ads aren't broken and I bet we can fix something. There's a reason our top clients stop guessing and start scaling. So if you've got campaigns that are burning cash, or you're having trouble barely even breaking even on them, let's have a look and let's see what we can fix. 100% no fluff, no sales pitch, just a pro-level ad review. So book your 30 minute free Facebook ad review session and walk away with some instant wins. Go to the Ads Clinic icon and book your call today. Do it now before you forget, but make sure you come back to listen to the rest of the podcast. Enjoy! Okay. So what you're looking at here is the campaign I've been running for approximately two months, And you can see straight away that I've got these different ads running. But the most important thing to understand is that I'm not just running seven random ads. Each of these represents a different creative concept. For example, I might have a screen share ad, I might have a testimonial, might have a talking head video, I might have something more educational. I might have something that's much more direct response and focused on the problem. That's the first level of diversity. But now let me open one of these up inside this particular ad. I've then got multiple versions of essentially the same creative. So let's say this is my screen share concept. I might have the same core screen share video, but version one starts with one hook. Version two starts with a completely different hook, and version three might have a different text overlay. Version four might change how quickly we get the actual content. The core idea hasn't changed. It's still the same concept, I'm giving meta different ways of presenting that concept to the audience. now I'm doing the same thing with the other ads. If we look at the testimonial ad, for example, again, I don't necessarily need to go out and get five completely different testimonials. can get one strong testimonial and create different variations of it. One might lead with the result. One might lead with the customer's problem. One might have the testimonial on the screen immediately. Another might have me introducing the testimonial before we show it. Same underlying asset, different executions. And suddenly one creative idea has become 4 or 5 different opportunities for meta to find the right person for that particular version. Now let's come back out and look at the actual numbers. So across these ads, we've spent approximately 1,700 pounds. our average cost per result across the campaign is 6.40 pounds. Now look at the individual ads because this is where I think it gets interesting. They're not all getting 6.40 pounds I've got some ads coming in considerably cheaper than that. I've got other ads that are more expensive, and naturally Metta is putting more spend behind certain ads and certain creatives than others. I don't necessarily see that as a problem, because I think one of the mistakes we make as advertiser expecting every ad to be a winner. That's not how I look at this campaign. I'm looking at the ecosystem of the campaign. Think about the way somebody actually buys. Not everybody sees one advert, clicks it and immediately converts. Somebody might see one of the educational videos and then they see a screen share. A few days later they say testimonial. Then maybe they see a much more direct advert talking about the problem they're currently experiencing. Those ads are doing different jobs, and that's why simply looking at every individual ad and saying, this one has a 5 pounds cost per result. So it's good. This one's 12 pounds, so it's bad. Can sometimes give you a completely wrong picture. Because meta is looking at all of these signals and all of these different opportunities to reach people through that journey. What I care about is what is the overall campaign producing. And right now that's 6 pounds, 40 per result. There's another benefit I've noticed from doing this frequency, because think about the amount of creative meta now has available. I've got around seven core ads, But each one has 3 to 5 different iterations inside Meta doesn't really have seven pieces of creative to choose from. It's potentially has 2030 plus variations. That gives the algorithm far more opportunities to show somebody something different. And it means I'm not hammering the same audience with exactly the same video hook or opening frame again and again. This is particularly important when you're working with smaller audiences, or when a campaign has been running for several weeks. Instead of immediately thinking, my campaign is increasing, I need to turn everything off and create another ten ads. I've effectively built that variation into the campaign from the beginning, but there is one thing I want to make really, really clear. I'm not saying take one advert and make 30 tiny variations of it. That's not creative diversity. If I've got a talking head video and I change the first sentence 20 times, I haven't suddenly created 20 completely different concepts. The structure I'm using is different concepts at the ad level, and then different iterations within each concept. That's the important distinction. So I want the screen share, I want the testimonial. I want the educational ad, I want the problem led ad, I want the direct response ad, I want different angles and formats. Then inside those concepts, I want meta to have multiple iterations to choose from. That's how I'm trying to give the algorithm both breadth and depth. And after running this for around two months, I think this is getting much closer to the direction meta wants advertiser to go. We're given the algorithm options. We're not trying to manually decide which person should see which advert. we're creating a genuinely diverse pool of creative and then allowing meta to make those decisions based on the signals it has about the individual user. And yes, there will be losers. There should be. If every single creator of your launching is getting exactly the same result, you're probably not testing enough difference between them, right? What matters is whether those creatives collectively produce the result you need in this account after around 1700 and spend that number is currently 6.40 pounds per result. So I'm happy to allow meta to decide where the outspend goes. if you take one thing away from this video, it's this stop thinking about creative diversity as simply I need more ads. Think about it in two layers. First, how many genuinely different creative concepts am I giving meta. And second, how many different ways can I execute each of those concepts? Because seven ads doesn't necessarily mean seven creatives, seven strong concepts, each with 3 to 5 intelligently created iterations, can give measure a huge amount of creative to work with without you having to reinvent your entire advertising strategy every week. And based on what I'm seeing, this account over the last two months a structure I'm going to continue testing for sure. If you want to see more videos like this where I'm actually talking to you inside live ad accounts showing you what I'm testing, what's working, and more importantly, what's not working. Make sure you subscribe to this channel and if you really matter as yourself, have a look at the account after you watching this, ask yourself, do I generally have creative diversity or do I just have lots of ads because they're not necessarily the same thing I'll see in the next video. Thank you for joining us again today. please feel free to drop us a message. We'd love to hear from you and any questions that you would like answered. We can do that here on the podcast. You.